Enzo Camargo Lima vs Marcos Lee Chan Baratau Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L W W L
Form
L L L L L L L W L LHead To Head: Lima 2 - 0 Baratau
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lima winning 3 and Baratau winning 0. The last match between Lima and Baratau was at the M15 Villa Maria, 16-03-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Enzo Camargo Lima getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Enzo Camargo Lima | 2 |
| Marcos Lee Chan Baratau | 0 |
M15 Villa Maria(16-03-2025)
| Lima | Stats | Baratau |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (8-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (1-2) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 21 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 45% (54-66) | Career Total W/L | 38% (18-29) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. | |||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 18 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Enzo Camargo Lima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Enzo Camargo Lima
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Camargo Lima
Player
Kousuke Ogura
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Enzo Camargo Lima
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
50%
(
37 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martinez
Player
Enzo Camargo Lima
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Suarez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yubel Ubri
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Perez
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Torrealba
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Dellien
Player
Marcos Lee Chan Baratau
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45% (54/66) | Win/Loss | 38% (18/29) |
| 47% (126/143) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (41/63) |
| 48% (1236/1314) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (440/535) |
| 48% (19/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) |
| 44% (35/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 12 | Aces Total | 28 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 76 | Total Double Faults | 59 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 167.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.68 |
| 69% (1567/2271) | 1st Serve % | 67% (1143/1694) |
| 56% (876/1567) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (638/1143) |
| 43% (301/704) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (239/551) |
| 41% (95/230) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (62/150) |
| 40% (865/2159) | Return Points Win % | 38% (621/1617) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (2/8) | Challenger W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 47% (52/58) | Futures W/L | 45% (17/21) |
| 46% (53/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (18/46) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (8/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 41% (12/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (6/11) |
| 86% (56/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (18/15) |
| 14% (56/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (18/3) |
| 9% (64/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (29/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
